It didn’t say anything about illegal aliens!! It said homeless!! And if the city can take the property using eminent domain then they can do the same to private property owners!! This is wrong!!
Instead of seizing the property why don’t they trade them for an equal property. They did that here on Cypress. Costco wanted the property that belonged to Cottonwood Church so they traded corners. In the end everyone was happy.
How about using that eminent domain to shut down the adult book & movie stores in the red light districts of New Jersey to house the homeless and illegals, instead of closing down churches who’s mission is to help the poor and teach civility to society by teaching the commandments of an almighty creator God.
This feels wrong. Maybe that’s because I always understood there is supposed to be a separation of church and state in our country. In addition, recreational use for the land also feels like a very weak reason to enact eminent domain.
Eminent domain, in my opinion, should only be used when absolutely necessary, such as when building a highway or a hospital where it is absolutely needed for the good of the community, state, or nation. My understanding is the owners of the property should also receive fair compensation for the property taken as well as any expenses they will incur vacating the property. However, it seems in this case, the church would likely only face this action again if they purchase other land nearby.
I can fully understand the community’s reluctance to have a homeless encampment since this will likely cause increases in crime, drug use, and bring down property values, but it still seems unfair to go to the extreme of enacting eminent domain.
The Democrats and the Left claim to be so Caring and Tolerant are So Evil and Phony Despicable, Let the Church do what they are planning on Doing Helping the Poor and Homeless. The things the community and Government fails to do. Don’t Ever Ever Ever give up your freedom or GUNS .God bless America 🇺🇸 and God bless President Trump 👍🇺🇸💪
It’s plain and simple WRONG🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 If they can take a Church, they can TAKE Your Home. Unfortunately the Libtard DemoncRATs are evil and do not give a RAT’s ass about the PEOPLE. They only care about their POWER!!!
The rich have spoken they dont want homeless people anywhere near them. How christian of them. They dont want to help their American brothers and sisters that are homeless.
Disgusting shame on the town God will get them
Soon Messiah will come.
i rather have rec space than illegal alien housing
It didn’t say anything about illegal aliens!! It said homeless!! And if the city can take the property using eminent domain then they can do the same to private property owners!! This is wrong!!
Instead of seizing the property why don’t they trade them for an equal property. They did that here on Cypress. Costco wanted the property that belonged to Cottonwood Church so they traded corners. In the end everyone was happy.
I don’t think Christ has opinion on pickle ball, contrary to what that mayor says. What an irrelevant statement.
Not surprising in The People’s Republic of NJ….glad I left.
How about using that eminent domain to shut down the adult book & movie stores in the red light districts of New Jersey to house the homeless and illegals, instead of closing down churches who’s mission is to help the poor and teach civility to society by teaching the commandments of an almighty creator God.
This feels wrong. Maybe that’s because I always understood there is supposed to be a separation of church and state in our country. In addition, recreational use for the land also feels like a very weak reason to enact eminent domain.
Eminent domain, in my opinion, should only be used when absolutely necessary, such as when building a highway or a hospital where it is absolutely needed for the good of the community, state, or nation. My understanding is the owners of the property should also receive fair compensation for the property taken as well as any expenses they will incur vacating the property. However, it seems in this case, the church would likely only face this action again if they purchase other land nearby.
I can fully understand the community’s reluctance to have a homeless encampment since this will likely cause increases in crime, drug use, and bring down property values, but it still seems unfair to go to the extreme of enacting eminent domain.
The Democrats and the Left claim to be so Caring and Tolerant are So Evil and Phony Despicable, Let the Church do what they are planning on Doing Helping the Poor and Homeless. The things the community and Government fails to do. Don’t Ever Ever Ever give up your freedom or GUNS .God bless America 🇺🇸 and God bless President Trump 👍🇺🇸💪
Agree 👍. Mr Bill .
It’s plain and simple WRONG🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 If they can take a Church, they can TAKE Your Home. Unfortunately the Libtard DemoncRATs are evil and do not give a RAT’s ass about the PEOPLE. They only care about their POWER!!!
This is absolutely disgusting!!! I believe God would rather have a homeless shelter there then a freaking pickle ball court!!!
The rich have spoken they dont want homeless people anywhere near them. How christian of them. They dont want to help their American brothers and sisters that are homeless.