I don’t think it would be wise to eliminate it, but I do think it needs to be reduced in size and there needs to be a way to ensure judges aren’t legislating from the bench. They should be following the law as it was intended and not adding their own spin to it.
I’m worried that their are people that said yes . We are a country of laws without the judicial branch we will be lost. However I do believe their needs to be checks and balances. The judge shopping for a favorable outcome should be very alarming.
Of government officials can put a stop to the over reach however the Republican party is to weak to actually pass legislation. Their is a huge issue with our checks and balances.
The supreme Court is another issue. I’m so confused how the law of the land doesn’t have a clear line and how many judge can side with their own political leanings and not the law..
I wouldn’t want to eliminate it. The SCOTUS needs to clearly define the rules for lower courts. I don’t believe what the lower courts are doing is within their jurisdiction or constitutional. Also legislating from the bench and biased judges need to go. I believe the Obama era taught and allowed lawyers and judges to use the law to actually twist, manipulate and circumvent laws
Overhaul not eliminate. The SCOTUS needs to be more actively engaged with the lower courts. Judges need to be neutral and not influenced by the likes of outside sources (Soros etc). This surge in the judicial process is a Democrat tool. It’s being abused and these radical judges need to go. There needs to be a balance so that it’s fair for all people. Judges need to follow the rules and not interpret them for their own party gain. There has been a lot of stretching going on and it needs to stop.
I wouldn’t want them eliminated.
I would however like to see Congress get off their butts & limit judicial branch to its own district & stay in their own lane. I also don’t think it should be a lifetime appointment. There should be regular reviews of all the judges to make sure they are staying honest.
Do want to eliminate judges but they need guide lines to stay in their lane. Shouldn’t be able to stop the president that he was elected to do by the majority. Totally left judges stopping everything and it needs to stop
I would not eliminate them, but I would do much more to keep them in line and to implement better nomination and screening processes to avoid corruption.
Judges are supposed to be IMPARTIAL and apply the letter of the law. The same duty of impartiality implies to judges as it does to juries. Judges are supposed to recuse themselves from hearing a case if they have a personal interest in the subject matter or a personal relationship with any of the parties.
Basically, they should not be hearing and ruling on cases if they cannot do so objectively. Being a judge requires a great deal of self discipline, and they need to reel in their political views in order to do their job properly and honestly. They need to set politics aside and follow the law.
The judicial branch consists only of the Supreme Court. Federal judges are not part of the judicial branch of government as the Constitution defines judicial. Federal judges were created by Congress. And only Congress can create or eliminate them. That’s the way our articles are set up.
Does not fix the problem…
Call it out-clean it out-return to our Constitutional Republic…Constitution & By Laws and educate non-edited, accurate history.
SPREAD THE FACT…WE ARE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!!
I voted no.. the problem is that many of the district judges aren’t judges at all.. They are political activists doing everything they can to stop Trump.. If we had a functioning SCOTUS, this would have been stopped already… If we’re lucky, maybe the SCOTUS will get off their collective asses and finally do something about this… The rogue judges currently have more power than the president..
Without the Judicial Branch of Government, we would not have a Republic. It shouldn’t be eliminated! However, the Founders of our Constitutioal Republic made it the least powerful Branch for a reason. It’s now out of control with tyrannical activist Judges usurping power from the Executive Branch. By the way, the President IS the Chief Judge, Prosecutor and Head Executive according to the Constitution. Trump is using his Executive powers correctly. Congress can limit or strip these Judges of their power, but they’re too weak to do it. The solution is for Trump to suspend Habeus (spelling?) Corpus which suspends the ruling power of these Judges. It can be used in times of war or invasion according to the Constitution. Lincoln used it when he met the same type of partisan resistance. I’m not an expert on how it works, but it is a powerful tool that Trump has as President under the Constitution.
Federal judges should not be allowed to override the president…only the Supreme Court. Judges are not to a legislate, but many think they can and should be removed. Judgeships should not be lifetime appointments…term limits for ALL…President, Congress and judges.
I don’t think it would be wise to eliminate it, but I do think it needs to be reduced in size and there needs to be a way to ensure judges aren’t legislating from the bench. They should be following the law as it was intended and not adding their own spin to it.
I want the SCOTUS to have 51 members, 1 sent by the legislature of each state, and 1 nominated by the president.
I’m worried that their are people that said yes . We are a country of laws without the judicial branch we will be lost. However I do believe their needs to be checks and balances. The judge shopping for a favorable outcome should be very alarming.
Of government officials can put a stop to the over reach however the Republican party is to weak to actually pass legislation. Their is a huge issue with our checks and balances.
The supreme Court is another issue. I’m so confused how the law of the land doesn’t have a clear line and how many judge can side with their own political leanings and not the law..
Amen!!
Limited the power of the federal courts outside of the SCOTUS.
I wouldn’t want to eliminate it. The SCOTUS needs to clearly define the rules for lower courts. I don’t believe what the lower courts are doing is within their jurisdiction or constitutional. Also legislating from the bench and biased judges need to go. I believe the Obama era taught and allowed lawyers and judges to use the law to actually twist, manipulate and circumvent laws
Overhaul not eliminate. The SCOTUS needs to be more actively engaged with the lower courts. Judges need to be neutral and not influenced by the likes of outside sources (Soros etc). This surge in the judicial process is a Democrat tool. It’s being abused and these radical judges need to go. There needs to be a balance so that it’s fair for all people. Judges need to follow the rules and not interpret them for their own party gain. There has been a lot of stretching going on and it needs to stop.
I wouldn’t want them eliminated.
I would however like to see Congress get off their butts & limit judicial branch to its own district & stay in their own lane. I also don’t think it should be a lifetime appointment. There should be regular reviews of all the judges to make sure they are staying honest.
Do want to eliminate judges but they need guide lines to stay in their lane. Shouldn’t be able to stop the president that he was elected to do by the majority. Totally left judges stopping everything and it needs to stop
I would not eliminate them, but I would do much more to keep them in line and to implement better nomination and screening processes to avoid corruption.
Judges are supposed to be IMPARTIAL and apply the letter of the law. The same duty of impartiality implies to judges as it does to juries. Judges are supposed to recuse themselves from hearing a case if they have a personal interest in the subject matter or a personal relationship with any of the parties.
Basically, they should not be hearing and ruling on cases if they cannot do so objectively. Being a judge requires a great deal of self discipline, and they need to reel in their political views in order to do their job properly and honestly. They need to set politics aside and follow the law.
The judicial branch consists only of the Supreme Court. Federal judges are not part of the judicial branch of government as the Constitution defines judicial. Federal judges were created by Congress. And only Congress can create or eliminate them. That’s the way our articles are set up.
Does not fix the problem…
Call it out-clean it out-return to our Constitutional Republic…Constitution & By Laws and educate non-edited, accurate history.
SPREAD THE FACT…WE ARE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!!
I voted no.. the problem is that many of the district judges aren’t judges at all.. They are political activists doing everything they can to stop Trump.. If we had a functioning SCOTUS, this would have been stopped already… If we’re lucky, maybe the SCOTUS will get off their collective asses and finally do something about this… The rogue judges currently have more power than the president..
Judges should honor and obey the law. If they don’t do this they should be prosecuted like any other law breaker. No one is holding them to the law.
Without the Judicial Branch of Government, we would not have a Republic. It shouldn’t be eliminated! However, the Founders of our Constitutioal Republic made it the least powerful Branch for a reason. It’s now out of control with tyrannical activist Judges usurping power from the Executive Branch. By the way, the President IS the Chief Judge, Prosecutor and Head Executive according to the Constitution. Trump is using his Executive powers correctly. Congress can limit or strip these Judges of their power, but they’re too weak to do it. The solution is for Trump to suspend Habeus (spelling?) Corpus which suspends the ruling power of these Judges. It can be used in times of war or invasion according to the Constitution. Lincoln used it when he met the same type of partisan resistance. I’m not an expert on how it works, but it is a powerful tool that Trump has as President under the Constitution.
The Judicial. Ranch has become the arm of the Democrats. Either abolish sh it or clean it up.
Federal judges should not be allowed to override the president…only the Supreme Court. Judges are not to a legislate, but many think they can and should be removed. Judgeships should not be lifetime appointments…term limits for ALL…President, Congress and judges.
I voted NO because we need checks and balances but we need Roberts and Congress to reign in these activist judges by restricting their powers by law.