(Commenting on)  DOJ INVESTIGATION: Assistant AG Dhillon confirms Charlie Kirk’s murder investigated as a ‘hate crime’

  RETURN TO ARTICLE

3 COMMENTS

  1. This is gaslighting. There is no such thing as a “hate” crime. This is just a crime.

    Who gets to play god and decide what “hate” is? Someone commits murder, it’s murder. Someone commits assault, it’s assault.

    The word “hate” is a very strong descriptive word. I hate school. I hate potato pancakes. I hate what that person said or did.

    The word “hate” itself is being used to manipulate and control the masses, and it’s doing a pretty good job of it.

    The only reason the powers that be in this case are declaring this crime as “hate” is because it is one of the exemptions for a crime to be investigated by the FBI and not local law enforcement.

    The murder of a person is always investigated by the local law enforcement in that area. If it’s a high profile case, that law enforcement agency has the ability and right to ask for the county, or usually state law enforcement agency to do the investigation.

    Why wasn’t the crime scene secured? Why was all TPUSA video equipment removed immediately following the crime? Why was the body allowed to be put on a plane and flown out of the state? Where’s the autopsy report? Where’s the bullet and the ballistic testing? Why was the crime scene allowed to be torn up and paved over within four days?

    The answer: The FBI needs to control the narrative.

  2. No one believes the FBI narrative about the “lone gunman”. There is definitely a lot that doesn’t add up about this case and there is definitely a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson acted alone. It’s looking like this was an inside job and likely involved Israel. The FBI is untrustworthy.

Comments are closed.