The 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified on February 27, 1951, strictly limits any person to being elected president no more than twice.
It was proposed by a Republican-controlled Congress in 1947 as a direct reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s four consecutive terms from 1933 to 1945 amid the Great Depression and World War II. FDR’s unprecedented tenure shattered George Washington’s voluntary two-term tradition, prompting fears of monarchical power and leading Republicans to codify the limit.
Now, after Donald Trump’s 2024 win for a second non-consecutive term, some allies like Rep. Randy Fine and Steve Bannon are pushing the idea to repeal it for a Trump third term in 2028. Fine argued for a repeal if Trump brokers a Gaza peace, while Bannon claims a secret “plan” exists to make Trump president again.
Trump has flirted with the notion—saying he’d “love to” serve longer—but on October 29, aboard Air Force One, he shut it down, calling it “pretty clear” the Constitution bars a third run and lamenting “it’s too bad.”
Supporters insist the stolen 2020 election nullifies his current term as a true “second,” and non-consecutive service allows another without repeal. They further argue that repeal frees future high-performing presidents—like a thriving Trump—to keep delivering results, as Ronald Reagan once advocated.
Yet overturning it is disastrous, according to some: they claim it invites dictatorship by erasing checks against indefinite rule, echoing the very tyrannies the founders fled. Repeal demands two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states—nearly impossible in a polarized America—and could enable rivals like Obama to run for a third term.
We want to ask you, the reader: would you support overturning the 22nd Amendment? Answer in our poll below and comment your thoughts on the possibility.
If you cannot see the poll, click here.
