Democrats have claimed that the SAVE Act and voter ID laws represent “Jim Crow 2.0,” arguing they would suppress minority votes and disenfranchise millions of eligible Americans.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has been one of the most vocal critics, repeatedly calling the SAVE Act “nothing more than Jim Crow 2.0” and vowing that every Senate Democrat would oppose it, describing it as reminiscent of discriminatory practices from a century ago. Other Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, have echoed this rhetoric by labeling the measures as voter suppression tactics.
Jim Crow laws were a post-Reconstruction system of racial segregation and disenfranchisement in the South, enforced through poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses, intimidation, and violence that effectively barred most Black Americans (and many poor whites) from voting until the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Many view the “Jim Crow 2.0” comparison as exaggerated because modern voter ID requirements lack the explicit racial targeting, poll taxes, or violent enforcement of the original Jim Crow era, and they often include accommodations like free IDs. Americans are required to show photo ID for routine activities such as boarding airplanes, purchasing alcohol or firearms, opening bank accounts, driving, or even attending events like Democratic National Conventions and certain Senate town halls, yet some resist applying the same standard to voting.
Despite the partisan divide, voter ID laws enjoy broad public support across demographics. Recent polls show roughly 83% of Americans favor requiring government-issued photo ID to vote, including about 71% of Democrats and strong majorities of independents and Republicans.
We want to ask you, the reader: do you believe Voter ID laws promote ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ concerns? Answer in our poll below and comment your thoughts on these “concerns.”
If you cannot see the poll, click here.
