For ads-free news, click here.
The debate over federal versus state power in education has long pitted advocates of centralized oversight against champions of local control.
Proponents of state power argue that education is best managed close to home, where policies can reflect regional values and needs, avoiding the one-size-fits-all approach exemplified by the controversial Common Core standards. Critics of federal overreach point to Common Core’s rigid benchmarks, which many parents and educators felt stifled creativity and ignored local priorities, fueling a push for state autonomy.
President Trump signed an executive order aiming to dismantle federal influence over education, redirecting authority to the states in a move hailed by conservatives as a victory for local governance. Supporters of this shift say states can innovate freely, tailoring curricula—like Texas boosting vocational training or Florida emphasizing parental rights—without bureaucratic meddling from Washington. However, detractors warn that state control could widen disparities, with wealthier states like California outpacing poorer ones like West Virginia in funding and outcomes. They argue that federal oversight, through programs like Title I, ensures a baseline of equity that some states might neglect.
Data shows the U.S. spends over $800 billion annually on K-12 education, with states footing most of the bill, yet federal standards have historically driven reforms like desegregation. The fear is that without a national backstop, underfunded states could falter.
We want to ask you, the reader: do you believe in state power over education? Answer in our poll below and comment your thoughts on Trump’s executive order on eliminating the Department of Education.
If you cannot see the poll, click here.
The Dennis Michael Lynch Podcast archive is available below. Never miss an episode. Subscribe to the show by downloading The DML News App or go to Apple Podcasts.
